The God Culture Philippines Biblical History Library

Archaeological Evidence of Ophir’s Gold

In 1946, archaeologists discovered inscribed pottery shards referencing Ophir's gold...

Read More →

Want Exclusive Research Updates?

Cagayan River = Lequios River. That's Not Ryukyu!

🪶 THE SMOKING QUILL | May 13, 2025

The Proper Way to Read Pinto’s Account: Validated by an 18th-Century Spanish-British Map

Lequios River, Five Isles, and the Final Blow to Ryukyu Theory

In 1794, Spanish and British navigators collaborated to produce a stunning chart of the China Sea and Philippine Islands. Included on that map is a detail that settles the centuries-old debate surrounding Fernão Mendes Pinto’s mysterious “Lequios Isles.”

This map—comparing Murillo Velarde’s 1734 Spanish chart with the surveys of British mariner Capt. Robert Carr—identifies three unmistakable features:

  1. The Lequios River, clearly labeled on the northern coast of Luzon (modern-day Cagayan River, flowing into Aparri).

  2. The Bashi/Baschee Isles, today known as the Batanes Islands—also Pinto’s place of shipwreck.

  3. The Five Isles west of the Bashee group, marked with uncertainty, but clearly west—not north—of Luzon.

📍 That’s not Ryukyu. That’s Philippine territory.

📜 Pinto Said “Five Very Large Isles” — But These Aren’t Them

Let’s be clear: the “Five Isles” west of Batanes, drawn on this map, are not the five massive islands Pinto described. In fact, they don’t appear to exist in real geography. So, what are they?

They were an attempt by European cartographers to interpret Pinto’s account. They knew:

  • The shipwreck occurred in or near Batanes.

  • Pinto then traveled westward to a group of five massive, resource-rich isles.

  • These were west of the Bashee Isles [Batanes]—not north like Ryukyu.

The mistake? Assuming they were small isles rather than what Pinto really meant: Luzon, Mindoro, Panay, Negros, and Cebu—major islands west of Batanes, all matching his descriptions of size, trade, courts, ships, and gold.

[Read Our Blog on the Five Very Large Isles of Pinto]

🧭 Directional Logic Matters
If Pinto's 5 Very Large Isles were WEST of Batanes, how can they possibly be north like Ryukyu? They can't. The orientation alone disproves it.

🗺️ And Then There's the Leoques River...

Here’s the clincher. The Cagayan River, clearly marked on the 1794 map, is labeled “Lequios R.” That’s not a guess. That’s confirmation. The Lequios were anchored to Luzon’s north.

And it gets even deeper:

  • Aparri, at the river mouth, matches the Hebrew Aupir (Ophir). The entrance to the River of Gold. 

  • The local Ibanag tribe uses the word Aparri to mean priest, aligning with Ophir’s spiritual heritage.

  • The river’s source lies in Luzon’s most gold-rich highlands, exactly as described by ancient sources.

  • The entire Northern Portion of Luzon and the Islands to the North have Ilocono populations and that, too, is no coincidence.

  • [Watch Ancient Entrance to Ophir / Aupir, Philippines]

🧭 Pliny’s Tubero River = Tubig Arao on the Lequios River

Evidence of the Philippines as Ancient Chryse (The Golden Isle)

On the 1794 map (cross-referencing Murillo Velarde), just north of the Lequios River (Cagayan) and South of Aparri, we find a river labeled Tubig Arao.

  • Tubig” = Water (in Tagalog and related languages)

  • Araw” = Sun

  • So: Tubig Arao = “Water of the Sun” or “Sunlit Waters”

Pliny the Elder, writing in Natural History (Book 6), refers to the River Tubero flowing through Chryse, the “Golden Isle.” The match is striking:

  • Tubero likely derived from a local term—like “Tubig Arao”—transliterated by Roman ears

  • “Tubig Arao” fits the Chrysean theme of gold and light, as “sunlit water” in the land of Ophir is more than symbolic—it’s literal

  • This river is geographically placed where Pliny described it: east of India, near the rising sun, and abundant in gold

  • Pliny began his mapping in China passing 2 Chinese and 1 Vietnamese River, then, crossing a bay (South China Sea) to Chryse, which is the Philippines. That is the land where he described this river.

Thus, this river—flowing into the Lequeos River, into the gold trade port of Aparri—isn’t just a match in name, but in location, language, and thematic symbolism.

⚠️ Colonial Mapmakers Lost the Plot—But Not the Coordinates

They didn’t grasp Pinto’s symbolic and cultural depth. They drew five islands, but missed the fact that Pinto’s “five” weren’t tiny dots—they were the entire Philippine core, all with coordinates West of Batanes.

But they got the orientation right: west of Batanes, anchored to the Leoques River, and nowhere near Japan.

🧭 Final Thoughts

This 1794 map—validated by both Spanish and British sources—solidifies the case:

  • Pinto's Lequios Isles are in the Luzon Region.

  • The Lequios River is real.

  • The Five Isles were misunderstood, but they still debunk Ryukyu.

  • The truth was right there, etched in ink centuries ago.

🔥 Let the map speak for itself.

BONUS DISCOVERIES:

🟡 Sinay Isle and Region

What modern maps now call Sinait (with a Spanish-added “T”) was historically labeled Sinay on multiple 18th-century French maps—a naming convention now reaffirmed by this Spanish-British chart.

Why is there an island and region bearing this name?

This may be more than coincidence. “Sinay” could represent a deeply rooted historical memory—possibly linked to the ancient region names mapped by Ptolemy, including:

  • Aurea (Chryse)

  • Cattigara

  • Sabadibae

  • Iabadee

  • Maniola

All of these—based on linguistic, cartographic, and geographic alignment—have been consistently demonstrated to point not to India or China, but to the Philippines.

The appearance of Sinay on both European and local maps strengthens the case that this name—like Lequios, Ophir, and Chryse—is part of a forgotten pre-colonial Philippine cartographic legacy now returning to light.

[Watch Sinai Philippines? on YouTube]


🟡 Meangis Is. – Abounding in Gold

This label south of Mindanao is highly significant on this 1794 Map.

  • Meangis (or Mangsee/Miangis?) Islands appear in older cartographic records. Their location on this chart matches a small archipelago near Balabac Strait, between Palawan and northern Borneohistorically rich in gold trade.

  • The phrase “abounding in gold” is a major signal—especially since Portuguese and Spanish gold maps only used this designation sparingly.

  • This reinforces the idea that gold-rich zones were widespread throughout the Philippine sphere, not just Luzon—supporting Chryse (Golden Isle) and Ophir as a national-scale identity.

Caracoa Philippines Junk Ship
Caracoa Philippines Ship

The Karakoa: Visually Confirmed on the 1734 Murillo Velarde Map

  • The Murillo Velarde map, often called the "Mother of all Philippine Maps," not only charts boundaries and regions—it also visually preserves indigenous maritime technology.

  • The Karakoa, the famed warship and trade vessel of the ancient Filipino warrior-merchants, is clearly illustrated off the coast of Negros and again near Panay.

  • This serves as historical cartographic validation of that the Philippines—not Ryukyu—was known for:

  • Large ships

  • Naval superiority

  • Warrior-trader culture

This matches Pinto’s Lequios description exactly:
  • “large merchant ships,”

  • “militarized vessels,”

  • and “court-summoned warriors on horseback.”

[Full Map View With Hi Resolution Zoom]

A Chart of the China Sea, and Philippine Islands, with the Archipelagos of Felicia and Soloo, Shewing the whole Tract comprized, between Canton and Balambangan, with the Soundings, Shoals, Rocks, & ca. Composed from an Original Drawing, Communicated by Capt. Robert Carr. and Compared with the Map of Pedro Murillo de Velarde, Engraved at Manilla in 1734. as well as with the Surveys of Several British Navigators. London / 1794. 

Description: "One of the great 18th-century English charts of the Philippines, this map offers an in-depth navigational account of a significant swath of the Southeast Asian seascape. First published by Robert Sayer in 1778, and here republished by Laurie & Whittle in 1794, the chart draws upon multiple sources, including an original drawing from Captain Robert Carr and the famous 1734 map by Pedro Murillo de Velarde, to deliver a comprehensive depiction of the marine corridor between Canton and Balambangan."

– Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps, Inc. Editorial Use Per the Fair Use Act.

[Full Map View With Hi Resolution Zoom]

Bagay, Nicolás De La Cruz, Engraver, and Pedro Murillo Velarde. A Hydrographical and Chorographical Chart of the Philippine Islands. [Manila: Publisher Not Identified, 1734] Map. Retrieved from the Library of Congress, <www.loc.gov/item/2021668467/>.

This is one of the main maps used to prove the West Philippine Sea Shoals belong to the Philippines.

Special thanks to Mel Velarde for special permission to use this map.

Join The God Culture Community

Become a part of our mission to promote truth and enlightenment. Sign up now to receive exclusive updates, resources, and more.