The God Culture Philippines Biblical History Library

THE GOD CULTURE PHILIPPINES BLOG | APRIL 1, 2025 AGAIN

Responding to the Misuse of Our Words Again: TheGodCulturePhilippines.com Blog Rebuttal 

Introduction:
Once again, we find ourselves responding to another defamatory blog post filled with misleading narratives, selective misquotations, and deliberate attempts to discredit years of sound, transparent research. This latest entry, dated March 31, 2025, targets our new website TheGodCulturePhilippines.com, launching a barrage of mischaracterizations — not to engage in scholarly dialogue, but to maintain a smear campaign against Timothy Jay Schwab and The God Culture. We address the false claims point by point below, correcting the record with documented facts, theological clarity, and legal precision.

🔍 OVERVIEW: Intent and Tone

This blog entry is clearly written not as an objective critique, but as a personal attack. The tone is accusatory, mocking, and inflammatory, not academic. It continues the same patterns as previous blogs:

• Misrepresents quotes and teachings to reach false theological conclusions (e.g., calling Tim "anti-Trinitarian").

• Dismisses correction or clarification as deception.

• Mocks identity and motives, rather than offering credible evidence.

• Dismisses the AI reviews while simultaneously misrepresenting what they are and how they were used.

📌 KEY CLAIMS AND RESPONSE ANALYSIS

1. Accusation of Lying About Sources

The blogger claims:

“Now that Tim says he’s read the sources, I can now call him a liar…”

🧠 Assessment: This is defamatory. The logic here is deeply flawed. Reading a source and interpreting it differently than the blogger does is not a lie. The blog falsely equates interpretive disagreement with intentional deception.

Legal risk for the blogger: This is an example of defamation per se if proven to affect your public standing.

2. Anti-Trinitarian Claim

The blogger asserts:

“He teaches the Holy Spirit is not God, is not eternal, and is likely a creature.”

🧠 Assessment: This misrepresents The God Culture's statements in context. We’ve repeatedly clarified that we have not denied the roles of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit — we’ve even said they are Eternal, while clarifying definitions and exploring historical and Biblical interpretations. These comments are taken out of context and misused to label our position in a way that triggers theological condemnation (slander under religious discrimination).

✅ Our site already clarifies this well.

3. Claim that We're "Compiling Our Own Bible"

He writes:

“That means this Bible will have his spin on it. Thus it will be 'The God Culture Bible.'”

🧠 Assessment: We’ve never claimed to be producing a “God Culture Bible,” and have explained our Torah Test process thoroughly, focus on Qumran materials, and the Levite Bible Series clearly. The blogger acknowledges this—then still falsely claims we are publishing a God Culture Bible.

This is deliberate misrepresentation.

4. Missionary Visa Accusation

He rehashes his earlier claim which is brazen:

“He is obviously involved in missionary work...so he must have a missionary visa.”

🧠 Assessment: Iliterate! We’ve clarified that Timothy is a legal permanent resident and does not require a missionary visa. This portion is factually incorrect, already refuted, and is now repeated with reckless disregard for the truth, escalating liability for harassment and cyber libel.

5. AI Peer Review Misrepresentation

He claims:

“Tim misunderstands AI... AI cannot peer review research... His use of AI proves nothing.”

🧠 Assessment:

• He misrepresents how AI was used in our project — not to replace human review but as a test of claims, precisely disclosed and explained.

• He uses long AI-generated responses without providing evidence that the actual prompts we gave were biased.

• The tone implies we've deliberately misled readers — a libelous assumption, especially given our transparency about methodology.

This attack on our AI peer reviews is not based on our actual methods or explanations, but an imagined strawman argument.

This rebuttal not only clarifies the record for our readers but also serves as critical legal context, as this blogger continues to cross ethical and legal boundaries, even today, a continued, consistent, easily provable pattern of reckless behavior. From unfounded accusations of religious heresy to false claims of visa violations and malicious abuse of public platforms like Amazon, this behavior is not only defamatory — it may constitute severe cyber libel and harassment under the law.

Truth matters. Evidence matters. And we will continue to stand on both. Yah Bless.